What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? : findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence / Charlotte Abramsky, Charlotte H. Watts, Claudia Garcia-Moreno, Karen Devries, Legia Kiss, Mary Ellsberg, Henrica AFM Jansen and Lori Heise
By: Abramsky, Tanya
.
Contributor(s): Garcia-Moreno, Claudia | Devries, Karen | Kiss, Ligia | Ellsberg, Mary | Jansen, Henrica | Heise, Lori L | Watts, Charlotte H.
Material type: 
ArticleSeries: BMC Public Health.Description: 17 p.Subject(s): PREVENTION | World Health Organization | RECOMMENDED READING | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | RISK FACTORSOnline resources: Click here to access online
In:
BMC Public Health 2011, 11:109Summary: The main findings, recently published in the open access journal BMC Public Health are that:
• despite wide variations in the prevalence of IPV, many factors affect IPV risk similarly across sites.
• as far as IPV is concerned, high socio-economic status (SES) and formal marriage offer protection to women.
• alcohol abuse, cohabitation, young age, attitudes supportive of wife beating, having outside sexual partners and growing up with domestic violence increase the risk of IPV.
• similarly, experiencing or perpetrating other forms of violence in adulthood increase the risk of IPV.
• since risk of IPV is highest in younger women, schools are an important setting for primary prevention activities.
• particularly, schools have the potential to address issues of relationships, gender roles, power and coercion within existing youth violence and bullying programmes.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal article
|
Family Violence library | TRVF000121 | Available | FV11120687 |
BMC Public Health 2011, 11:109
Recommended reading
The main findings, recently published in the open access journal BMC Public Health are that:
• despite wide variations in the prevalence of IPV, many factors affect IPV risk similarly across sites.
• as far as IPV is concerned, high socio-economic status (SES) and formal marriage offer protection to women.
• alcohol abuse, cohabitation, young age, attitudes supportive of wife beating, having outside sexual partners and growing up with domestic violence increase the risk of IPV.
• similarly, experiencing or perpetrating other forms of violence in adulthood increase the risk of IPV.
• since risk of IPV is highest in younger women, schools are an important setting for primary prevention activities.
• particularly, schools have the potential to address issues of relationships, gender roles, power and coercion within existing youth violence and bullying programmes.
