A comparison of empirically based and structured professional judgment estimation of risk using the structured assessment of violence risk in youth Kristina Childs, Paul J. Frick, John S. Ryals, Annika Lingonblad, Matthew J. Villio
By: Childs, Kristina
.
Contributor(s): Frick, Paul J | Ryals, John S | Lingonblad, Annika | Villio, Matthew J.
Material type: 
ArticleSeries: Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice.Publisher: Sage, 2014Subject(s): JUSTICE | OFFENDERS | RISK ASSESSMENT | VIOLENCE | YOUNG PEOPLE | UNITED STATESOnline resources: Access the abstract
In:
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2014, 12(1): 40-57Summary: This study builds on a long-standing debate focusing on whether structured professional judgment (SPJ) or empirically based methods of risk estimation are more valid and reliable measures of future behavior by comparing three different measures of risk. (from the Abstract)
No physical items for this record
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2014, 12(1): 40-57
This study builds on a long-standing debate focusing on whether structured professional judgment (SPJ) or empirically based methods of risk estimation are more valid and reliable measures of future behavior by comparing three different measures of risk. (from the Abstract)
