It takes a village to protect a child Antonia Hendrick and Sue Young
By: Hendrick, Antonia.
Contributor(s): Young, Sue.
Material type: ArticlePublisher: Wellington, N.Z. : Social Workers Registration Board, 2013Description: electronic document (146 pages); PDF file: 1.93 MB; epub version available.Other title: In: Protecting the public - enhancing the profession | E tiaki ana i te Hapoori - E manaaki ana i ngā mahi : edited proceedings from the Social Workers Registration Board Conference 2013, (p. 15-25) / Jan Duke, Mark Henrickson and Liz Beddoe (editors).Subject(s): CHILD PROTECTION | CHILDREN'S RIGHTS | COMMUNITY ACTION | COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | AUSTRALIA | NEW ZEALANDOnline resources: Click here to access online Summary: "This article presents a case for taking a concerted community approach to protecting children. It does this through acknowledging that: child protection is indeed ‘everyone’s business’ (Landgren, 2005) and extending this into promoting a collective response rather than relying solely on child protection authorities to work with individual families; revisiting the ‘best interests’ criterion of child rights in protecting children; reiterating the argument (Young, McKenzie, Omre, Schjelderup, & Walker, 2014) for a much more nuanced understanding of, and response to, keeping children safe; and presenting some descriptions and analyses of community approaches to protecting children." (Authors' abstract)Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Access online | Family Violence library | Online | Available | ON14080158 |
"This article presents a case for taking a concerted community approach to protecting children. It does this through acknowledging that: child protection is indeed ‘everyone’s business’ (Landgren, 2005) and extending this into promoting a collective response rather than relying solely on child protection authorities to work with individual families; revisiting the ‘best interests’ criterion of child rights in protecting children; reiterating the argument (Young, McKenzie, Omre, Schjelderup, & Walker, 2014) for a much more nuanced understanding of, and response to, keeping children safe; and presenting some descriptions and analyses of community approaches to protecting children." (Authors' abstract)