A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools : a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants Jay P. Singh, Martin Grann and Seena Fazel
By: Singh, Jay P.
Contributor(s): Grann, Martin | [Fazel, Seena].
Material type: ArticleSeries: Clinical Psychology Review.Publisher: Elsevier, 2011Subject(s): ETHNICITY | GENDER | JUSTICE | MENTAL HEALTH | OFFENDERS | PERPETRATORS | RISK ASSESSMENT | VIOLENCE | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSOnline resources: Read the abstract In: Clinical Psychology Review, 2011, 31(3): 499–513Summary: The authors undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine commonly used risk assessment instruments following PRISMA guidelines. We collected data from 68 studies based on 25,980 participants in 88 independent samples.No physical items for this record
Clinical Psychology Review, 2011, 31(3): 499–513
The authors undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine commonly used risk assessment instruments following PRISMA guidelines. We collected data from 68 studies based on 25,980 participants in 88 independent samples.