Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Reasoning and bias : heuristics in safety assessment and placement decisions for children at risk Guy Enosh & Tali Bayer-Topilsky

By: Enosh, Guy.
Contributor(s): Bayer-Topilsky, Tali.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: British Journal of Social Work.Publisher: Oxford Journals, 2015Subject(s): CHILD PROTECTION | RISK ASSESSMENT | SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE | SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS | CHILD ABUSEOnline resources: Read the abstract In: British Journal of Social Work, 2015, 45(6): 1771-1787Summary: Whether the decision-making process for children at risk is biased against families from lower socio-economic or minority statuses remains a vexing question for social work practice and research. This study successfully isolates the subjective decision-making process and the intervening effect of overexposure of disadvantaged families to the welfare system by utilising a vignette-based factorial survey. The vignettes were drawn from actual welfare files of high, low and ambiguous risk and then edited to correspond with the experimental manipulation. One hundred and five child welfare case workers were asked to evaluate the vignettes, as follows: (i) to assess the level of risk to the child (‘subjective risk’) and (ii) to decide whether they would recommend out-of-home placement. (from the abstract). Record #4822
No physical items for this record

British Journal of Social Work, 2015, 45(6): 1771-1787

Whether the decision-making process for children at risk is biased against families from lower socio-economic or minority statuses remains a vexing question for social work practice and research. This study successfully isolates the subjective decision-making process and the intervening effect of overexposure of disadvantaged families to the welfare system by utilising a vignette-based factorial survey. The vignettes were drawn from actual welfare files of high, low and ambiguous risk and then edited to correspond with the experimental manipulation. One hundred and five child welfare case workers were asked to evaluate the vignettes, as follows: (i) to assess the level of risk to the child (‘subjective risk’) and (ii) to decide whether they would recommend out-of-home placement. (from the abstract). Record #4822