Normal view MARC view ISBD view

What is the potential for interventions designed to prevent violence against women to reduce children's exposure to violence? : findings from the SASA! study, Kampala, Uganda Nambusi Kyegombe, Tanya Abramsky, Karen Devries, Lori Michau, Janet Nakuti, Elizabeth Starmann, Tina Masuya, Lori Heise and Charlotte Watts

By: Nyegombe, Nambusi.
Contributor(s): Abramsky, Tanya | Devries, Karen | Michau, Lori | Nakuti, Janet | Starmann, Elizabeth | Musuya, Tina | Heise, Lori L | Watts, Charlotte.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Child Abuse & Neglect.Publisher: Elsevier, 2015Subject(s): COMMUNITY ACTION | INTERVENTION | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | SASA! study | PREVENTION | RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS | CHILD ABUSE | AFRICA | UGANDAOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Child Abuse & Neglect, 2015, Advance online publication, 24 October 2015Summary: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and child maltreatment often co-occur in households and lead to negative outcomes for children. This article explores the extent to which SASA!, an intervention to prevent violence against women, impacted children's exposure to violence. Between 2007 and 2012 a cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Kampala, Uganda. An adjusted cluster-level intention to treat analysis, compares secondary outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. Under the qualitative evaluation, 82 in-depth interviews were audio recorded at follow-up, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis complemented by constant comparative methods. This mixed-methods article draws mainly on the qualitative data. The findings suggest that SASA! impacted on children's experience of violence in three main ways. First, quantitative data suggest that children's exposure to IPV was reduced. We estimate that reductions in IPV combined with reduced witnessing by children when IPV did occur, led to a 64% reduction in prevalence of children witnessing IPV in their home (aRR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06-2.20). Second, among couples who experienced reduced IPV, qualitative data suggests parenting and discipline practices sometimes also changed-improving parent-child relationships and for a few parents, resulting in the complete rejection of corporal punishment as a disciplinary method. Third, some participants reported intervening to prevent violence against children. The findings suggest that interventions to prevent IPV may also impact on children's exposure to violence, and improve parent-child relationships. They also point to potential synergies for violence prevention, an area meriting further exploration. (Authors' abstract). Record #4860
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON15110014

Child Abuse & Neglect, 2015, Advance online publication, 24 October 2015

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and child maltreatment often co-occur in households and lead to negative outcomes for children. This article explores the extent to which SASA!, an intervention to prevent violence against women, impacted children's exposure to violence. Between 2007 and 2012 a cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Kampala, Uganda. An adjusted cluster-level intention to treat analysis, compares secondary outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. Under the qualitative evaluation, 82 in-depth interviews were audio recorded at follow-up, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis complemented by constant comparative methods. This mixed-methods article draws mainly on the qualitative data. The findings suggest that SASA! impacted on children's experience of violence in three main ways. First, quantitative data suggest that children's exposure to IPV was reduced. We estimate that reductions in IPV combined with reduced witnessing by children when IPV did occur, led to a 64% reduction in prevalence of children witnessing IPV in their home (aRR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06-2.20). Second, among couples who experienced reduced IPV, qualitative data suggests parenting and discipline practices sometimes also changed-improving parent-child relationships and for a few parents, resulting in the complete rejection of corporal punishment as a disciplinary method. Third, some participants reported intervening to prevent violence against children. The findings suggest that interventions to prevent IPV may also impact on children's exposure to violence, and improve parent-child relationships. They also point to potential synergies for violence prevention, an area meriting further exploration. (Authors' abstract). Record #4860