National comparison of cross-agency practice in investigating and responding to severe child abuse : a report to the NSW Ombudsman's Office (Report 1 of 2) James Herbert and Leah Bromfield
By: Herbert, James L.
Contributor(s): Bromfield, Leah.
Material type: BookPublisher: Adelaide, SA : Australian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia, 2017Description: electronic document (71 pages) ; PDF file: 1.52 MB.Subject(s): CHILD ABUSE | CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE | CHILD PROTECTION | INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION | INTERVENTION | JUSTICE | POLICE | POLICE PROCEDURES | AUSTRALIA | CANADA | DENMARK | FINLAND | GREENLAND | ICELAND | NEW ZEALAND | SCOTLAND | SWEDEN | UNITED KINGDOM | UNITED STATESOnline resources: Click here to access online Summary: This report summarises a comparison of Australian and select international jurisdictions against the approach of the Joint Investigation Response Team (JIRT) model in New South Wales. The structure of this report includes a brief rationale for the characteristics compared, a narrative summary of cross-agency responses in Australia, a narrative summary of selected cross-agency responses in equivalent international jurisdictions, and a detailed comparison of responses in Australian jurisdictions. This report reviewed a variety of international MDT models to better understand cross-agency practices in comparable jurisdictions. The included jurisdictions were judged to be comparable liberal democracies with similar social and economic conditions. The review included a brief narrative discussion of prominent international collaborative models. These include Child Advocacy Centres in the United States and Canada, Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (United Kingdom), Joint Child Abuse Investigation Teams (Scotland), Barnahus (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Greenland, & Iceland), and Puawaitahi (New Zealand). These are briefly compared to the JIRT model. (From the Executive summary). Record #5653Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Access online | Family Violence library | Online | Available | ON17100038 |
This report summarises a comparison of Australian and select international jurisdictions against the approach of the Joint Investigation Response Team (JIRT) model in New South Wales. The structure of this report includes a brief rationale for the characteristics compared, a narrative summary of cross-agency responses in Australia, a narrative summary of selected cross-agency responses in equivalent international jurisdictions, and a detailed comparison of responses in Australian jurisdictions.
This report reviewed a variety of international MDT models to better understand cross-agency practices in comparable jurisdictions. The included jurisdictions were judged to be comparable liberal democracies with similar social and economic conditions. The review included a brief narrative discussion of prominent international collaborative models. These include Child Advocacy Centres in the United States and Canada, Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (United Kingdom), Joint Child Abuse Investigation Teams (Scotland), Barnahus (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Greenland, & Iceland), and Puawaitahi (New Zealand). These are briefly compared to the JIRT model. (From the Executive summary). Record #5653