Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Changing practice cultures in statutory child protection : practitioners' perspectives Natasha Cortis, Ciara Smyth, Catherine Wade and Ilan Katz

By: Cortis, Natasha.
Contributor(s): Smyth, Ciara | Wade, Catherine | Katz, Ilan.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Child & Family Social work.Publisher: Wiley, 2018Subject(s): CHANGE MANAGEMENT | CHILD PROTECTION | SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE | SOCIAL SERVICES | AUSTRALIA | NEW SOUTH WALESOnline resources: Read abstract In: Child & Family Social Work, 2018, Advance online publication, 16 May 2018Summary: Many child protection systems struggle to implement effective models of frontline practice in the context of high caseloads, increasing costs, and compliance‐focused bureaucratic cultures. This article discusses changes brought about by “Practice First,” a framework for practice introduced to improve the quality and effectiveness of child protection work in New South Wales, Australia. Findings drawn from quantitative and qualitative research with practitioners show that the initiative was effective in changing cultures of practice. It enabled workers to spend more face‐to‐face time with families and build relationships and was perceived to improve the quality of decision‐making. At the same time, the article highlights difficulties in attempting to embed change in practice cultures when broader systemic challenges persist. (Authors' abstract). Record #5850
No physical items for this record

Child & Family Social Work, 2018, Advance online publication, 16 May 2018

Many child protection systems struggle to implement effective models of frontline practice in the context of high caseloads, increasing costs, and compliance‐focused bureaucratic cultures. This article discusses changes brought about by “Practice First,” a framework for practice introduced to improve the quality and effectiveness of child protection work in New South Wales, Australia. Findings drawn from quantitative and qualitative research with practitioners show that the initiative was effective in changing cultures of practice. It enabled workers to spend more face‐to‐face time with families and build relationships and was perceived to improve the quality of decision‐making. At the same time, the article highlights difficulties in attempting to embed change in practice cultures when broader systemic challenges persist. (Authors' abstract). Record #5850