Normal view MARC view ISBD view

"It’s tricky …" : intimate partner violence service providers’ perspectives of assessments and referrals by child welfare workers Annelise Mennicke, Lisa Langenderfer-Magruder and Lindsey MacConnie

By: Mennicke, Annelise M.
Contributor(s): Langenderfer-Magruder, Lisa | MacConnie, Lindsey.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Journal of Family Violence.Publisher: Springer, 2018Subject(s): CHILD EXPOSURE TO VIOLENCE | CHILD PROTECTION | CHILD WELFARE | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTERVENTION | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE | UNITED STATESOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Journal of Family Violence, 2018, Advance online publication, 17 August 2018Summary: The present study explored the perceptions of workers who provide intimate partner violence (IPV) services regarding child welfare workers’ IPV assessment and referral processes. Data from four focus groups was interrogated to find common themes. A total of 27 individuals participated in the focus groups, working in the community, shelters, and prisons/jails. Participants primarily expressed concerns regarding child welfare workers’ practices. IPV providers perceived child welfare workers as incompetent in performing IPV assessments and making referrals. IPV workers also perceived that some child welfare workers engaged in dismissive, manipulative, or coercive behaviors when working with IPV victims. While the present findings are not generalizable, they speak to the tension frequently noted between victim services and child welfare. Child welfare agencies should consider ongoing, trauma-informed training for IPV assessment to help increase worker self-efficacy in performing these tasks. Local, interdisciplinary trainings including both IPV and child welfare providers may be particularly useful to promote better understanding of each provider’s role in cases with co-occurring IPV and child maltreatment concerns, which may help to reduce tensions between the intersecting service systems. (Authors' abstract). Record #6000
No physical items for this record

Journal of Family Violence, 2018, Advance online publication, 17 August 2018

The present study explored the perceptions of workers who provide intimate partner violence (IPV) services regarding child welfare workers’ IPV assessment and referral processes. Data from four focus groups was interrogated to find common themes. A total of 27 individuals participated in the focus groups, working in the community, shelters, and prisons/jails. Participants primarily expressed concerns regarding child welfare workers’ practices. IPV providers perceived child welfare workers as incompetent in performing IPV assessments and making referrals. IPV workers also perceived that some child welfare workers engaged in dismissive, manipulative, or coercive behaviors when working with IPV victims. While the present findings are not generalizable, they speak to the tension frequently noted between victim services and child welfare. Child welfare agencies should consider ongoing, trauma-informed training for IPV assessment to help increase worker self-efficacy in performing these tasks. Local, interdisciplinary trainings including both IPV and child welfare providers may be particularly useful to promote better understanding of each provider’s role in cases with co-occurring IPV and child maltreatment concerns, which may help to reduce tensions between the intersecting service systems. (Authors' abstract). Record #6000