Normal view MARC view ISBD view

COVID-19 : the gendered impacts of the outbreak Clare Wenham, Julia Smith, Rosemary Morgan on behalf of the Gender and COVID-19 Working Group

By: Wenham, Clare.
Contributor(s): Smith, Julia | Morgan, Rosemary | Gender and COVID-19 Working Group.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: The Lancet.Publisher: The Lancet, 2020Subject(s): GENDER | COVID-19 | GENDER EQUALITY | HEALTH | PANDEMICS | PUBLIC HEALTH | WOMEN | INTERNATIONALOnline resources: Click here to access online In: The Lancet, 2020, 395(10227), 14 March 2020Summary: Policies and public health efforts have not addressed the gendered impacts of disease outbreaks.[1] The response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appears no different. We are not aware of any gender analysis of the outbreak by global health institutions or governments in affected countries or in preparedness phases. Recognising the extent to which disease outbreaks affect women and men differently is a fundamental step to understanding the primary and secondary effects of a health emergency on different individuals and communities, and for creating effective, equitable policies and interventions. Although sex-disaggregated data for COVID-19 show equal numbers of cases between men and women so far, there seem to be sex differences in mortality and vulnerability to the disease.]2] Emerging evidence suggests that more men than women are dying, potentially due to sex-based immunological[3] or gendered differences, such as patterns and prevalence of smoking.[4] However, current sex-disaggregated data are incomplete, cautioning against early assumptions. Simultaneously, data from the State Council Information Office in China suggest that more than 90% of health-care workers in Hubei province are women, emphasising the gendered nature of the health workforce and the risk that predominantly female health workers incur.[5] (Authors' abstract). Record #6570
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON20030011

The Lancet, 2020, 395(10227), 14 March 2020

Policies and public health efforts have not addressed the gendered impacts of disease outbreaks.[1] The response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appears no different. We are not aware of any gender analysis of the outbreak by global health institutions or governments in affected countries or in preparedness phases. Recognising the extent to which disease outbreaks affect women and men differently is a fundamental step to understanding the primary and secondary effects of a health emergency on different individuals and communities, and for creating effective, equitable policies and interventions.

Although sex-disaggregated data for COVID-19 show equal numbers of cases between men and women so far, there seem to be sex differences in mortality and vulnerability to the disease.]2] Emerging evidence suggests that more men than women are dying, potentially due to sex-based immunological[3] or gendered differences, such as patterns and prevalence of smoking.[4] However, current sex-disaggregated data are incomplete, cautioning against early assumptions. Simultaneously, data from the State Council Information Office in China suggest that more than 90% of health-care workers in Hubei province are women, emphasising the gendered nature of the health workforce and the risk that predominantly female health workers incur.[5] (Authors' abstract). Record #6570