Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Pressure drop : David McKendrick and Jo Finch securitising and de-securitising safeguarding

By: McKendrick, David.
Contributor(s): Finch, Jo.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work.Publisher: Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers, 2020Subject(s): CHILD PROTECTION | CHILD WELFARE | RISK MANAGEMENT | SOCIAL POLICY | SOCIAL SERVICES | SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE | INTERNATIONAL | UNITED KINGDOM | NEW ZEALANDOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 2020, 32(1): 61-72Summary: INTRODUCTION: This article explores how securitisation theory is mobilised in contemporary social work discourse, policy and practice. We draw on recent child protection research to support our claim that a new practice issue, described previously as securitised safeguarding, has emerged. APPROACH: We demonstrate its emergence using securitisation theory as a conceptual mode of analysis to describe how a securitised safeguarding response depicts particular families as an existential threat which, in turn, prompts a response characterised by forms of muscular liberalism. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that this emerging practice issue requires critical consideration and suggest it will have a significant impact on social work – one that is unlikely to be beneficial for the profession and, more importantly, families being worked with. By describing a process of de-securitisation, we offer an alternative and more nuanced approach that perceives families holistically, and mobilises a welfare safeguarding model. This more closely resembles traditional social work values of emancipation, liberation and empowerment within social work practice. (Authors' abstract). Record #6600
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON20040023

Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 2020, 32(1): 61-72

INTRODUCTION: This article explores how securitisation theory is mobilised in contemporary social work discourse, policy and practice. We draw on recent child protection research to support our claim that a new practice issue, described previously as securitised safeguarding, has emerged.

APPROACH: We demonstrate its emergence using securitisation theory as a conceptual mode of analysis to describe how a securitised safeguarding response depicts particular families as an existential threat which, in turn, prompts a response characterised by forms of muscular liberalism.

CONCLUSIONS: We argue that this emerging practice issue requires critical consideration and suggest it will have a significant impact on social work – one that is unlikely to be beneficial for the profession and, more importantly, families being worked with. By describing a process of de-securitisation, we offer an alternative and more nuanced approach that perceives families holistically, and mobilises a welfare safeguarding model. This more closely resembles traditional social work values of emancipation, liberation and empowerment within social work practice. (Authors' abstract). Record #6600