Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Housing interventions for intimate partner violence survivors : a systematic review L. B. Klein, Brittney R. Chesworth, Julia R. Howland-Myers, Cynthia Fraga Rizo , and Rebecca J. Macy

By: Klein, L.B.
Contributor(s): Chesworth, Brittney R | Howland-Myers, Julia R | Rizo, Cynthia Fraga | Macy, Rebecca J.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Trauma, Violence and Abuse.Publisher: Sage, 2019Subject(s): DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | EVALUATION | HOMELESSNESS | HOUSING | INTERVENTION | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | SUPPORT SERVICES | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | WOMEN'S REFUGES | VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTERNATIONAL | UNITED STATESOnline resources: DOI: 10.1177/1524838019836284 In: Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 2019, Advance online publication, 26 March 2019Summary: Intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors are much more likely to experience housing insecurity or homelessness than those who have not experienced IPV. However, little comprehensive research has evaluated the effectiveness of interventions used to address IPV survivors’ housing insecurity. To address this knowledge gap, our team conducted a systematic review guided by three questions: (a) What are current interventions for addressing IPV survivors’ housing needs? (b) What are the methodological strengths and limitations of the research evaluating those interventions? (c) How effective are the identified interventions? We identified potentially relevant peer-reviewed and gray literature using variations of predetermined search terms and four search methods. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria. Accordingly, this study showed that there is an overall dearth of research concerning interventions that address IPV survivors’ housing insecurity and needs. Shelter is the most commonly assessed and available housing intervention for IPV survivors, but only limited empirical evaluation is available of shelter effectiveness. In addition, findings indicate both traditional shelter services and innovative interventions (e.g., rapid rehousing, flexible funding) would benefit from rigorous evaluation including examining survivor and situation characteristics contributing to housing strategy effectiveness. (Authors' abstract). Record #66662
No physical items for this record

Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 2019, Advance online publication, 26 March 2019

Intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors are much more likely to experience housing insecurity or homelessness than those who have not experienced IPV. However, little comprehensive research has evaluated the effectiveness of interventions used to address IPV survivors’ housing insecurity. To address this knowledge gap, our team conducted a systematic review guided by three questions: (a) What are current interventions for addressing IPV survivors’ housing needs? (b) What are the methodological strengths and limitations of the research evaluating those interventions? (c) How effective are the identified interventions? We identified potentially relevant peer-reviewed and gray literature using variations of predetermined search terms and four search methods. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria. Accordingly, this study showed that there is an overall dearth of research concerning interventions that address IPV survivors’ housing insecurity and needs. Shelter is the most commonly assessed and available housing intervention for IPV survivors, but only limited empirical evaluation is available of shelter effectiveness. In addition, findings indicate both traditional shelter services and innovative interventions (e.g., rapid rehousing, flexible funding) would benefit from rigorous evaluation including examining survivor and situation characteristics contributing to housing strategy effectiveness. (Authors' abstract). Record #66662