Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The use of telepractice in the family and relationship services sector Anagha Joshi, Nicole Paterson, Trina Hinkley and Nerida Joss

By: Joshi, Anagha.
Contributor(s): Paterson, Nicole | Hinkley, Trina | Joss, Nerida.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: CFCA paper.Publisher: Melbourne, Vic : Child Family Community Australia, 2021Description: electronic document (23 pages) ; PDF file & HTML.ISBN: 978-1-76016-219-1 (Online).Subject(s): CHILDREN | COVID-19 | FAMILIES | INTERVENTION | ONLINE TOOLS | PANDEMICS | SUPPORT SERVICES | TECHNOLOGY | INTERNATIONAL | AUSTRALIAOnline resources: Click here to access online | Access the website CFCA paper, no. 57, May 2021Summary: Key messages: Telepractice can be a satisfactory form of service delivery for clients and practitioners, when personal preferences and client circumstances are considered; Key enablers of telepractice include ensuring that service providers are sufficiently skilled in the use of virtual service delivery and that clients and organisations have access to, and the skills to use, the necessary technological resources; Key barriers to using telepractice include difficulties engaging clients, digital inequities and privacy risks, practitioner resistance and an organisational environment that is not set up to support telepractice; The benefits of telepractice compared to face-to-face services include improved access to services for certain populations and it can provide practitioners with insights into family life through video-conferencing technology ; There is limited material comparing client outcomes from telepractice with client outcomes from face-to-face delivery; Some evidence suggests that telepractice may suit certain service areas (e.g. mental health related early intervention compared to other family and relationship services). (From the paper). Record #7168
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON21060024

CFCA paper, no. 57, May 2021

Key messages: Telepractice can be a satisfactory form of service delivery for clients and practitioners, when personal preferences and client circumstances are considered; Key enablers of telepractice include ensuring that service providers are sufficiently skilled in the use of virtual service delivery and that clients and organisations have access to, and the skills to use, the necessary technological resources; Key barriers to using telepractice include difficulties engaging clients, digital inequities and privacy risks, practitioner resistance and an organisational environment that is not set up to support telepractice; The benefits of telepractice compared to face-to-face services include improved access to services for certain populations and it can provide practitioners with insights into family life through video-conferencing technology ; There is limited material comparing client outcomes from telepractice with client outcomes from face-to-face delivery; Some evidence suggests that telepractice may suit certain service areas (e.g. mental health related early intervention compared to other family and relationship services). (From the paper). Record #7168

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer