Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Social networks of adolescent sexual violence perpetrators : peer friendship and trusted adult characteristics Dorothy L. Espelage, Kelly L. Rulison, Katherine M. Ingram, Alberto Valido, Karen Schmeelk-Cone and Peter A. Wyman

By: Espelage, Dorothy L.
Contributor(s): Rulison, Kelly L | Ingram, Katherine M | Valido, Alberto | Schmeelk-Cone, Karen | Wyman, Peter A.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Prevention Science.Publisher: Springer, 2021Subject(s): ADOLESCENTS | PERPETRATORS | SEXUAL VIOLENCE | YOUNG PEOPLE | INTERNATIONALOnline resources: DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01296-7 (Open access) In: Prevention Science, First published 3 September 2021Summary: The current study tested differences in social network characteristics of high school students who report perpetrating sexual violence (SV) versus those who do not. N = 4554 students (49% male, 49% female, 2% another gender identity; 45% Hispanic, 43% white, 12% another racial identity) from 20 high schools reported how often they had perpetrated 13 sexually violent behaviors. Using their responses, students were classified as follows: non-perpetrators, sexual harassment perpetrators, low contact perpetrators, or high contact perpetrators. Students named up to 7 close friends and up to 7 trusted adults at their school and answered questions about other behaviors and attitudes. This information was used to assess (1) students’ connections with peers, (2) students’ connections with trusted adults, and (3) friends’ characteristics. Multilevel models indicated that compared to their peers, high contact perpetrators were less involved in the peer networks, less connected to trusted adults, and more likely to have friends who were involved in risky behaviors (e.g., sexual violence, homophobic name-calling, substance use). Low contact perpetrators were as connected to peers and trusted adults as non-perpetrators but were more likely to have friends engaged in sexual violence and homophobic naming-calling perpetration. By contrast, sexual harassment perpetrators were more involved and held higher status in the peer network (e.g., received more friendship nominations) but otherwise had similar friendship characteristics and similar connections to trusted adults as non-perpetrators. Building on these results, social network-informed SV prevention should use opinion leaders to change SV norms throughout the network and encourage new relationships between low- and high-risk students so as to disseminate norms that do not tolerate SV. Promoting connections to trusted adults also may be a useful avenue, especially for isolated adolescents. (Authors' abstract). Record #7317
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON21100030

Prevention Science, First published 3 September 2021

The current study tested differences in social network characteristics of high school students who report perpetrating sexual violence (SV) versus those who do not. N = 4554 students (49% male, 49% female, 2% another gender identity; 45% Hispanic, 43% white, 12% another racial identity) from 20 high schools reported how often they had perpetrated 13 sexually violent behaviors. Using their responses, students were classified as follows: non-perpetrators, sexual harassment perpetrators, low contact perpetrators, or high contact perpetrators. Students named up to 7 close friends and up to 7 trusted adults at their school and answered questions about other behaviors and attitudes. This information was used to assess (1) students’ connections with peers, (2) students’ connections with trusted adults, and (3) friends’ characteristics. Multilevel models indicated that compared to their peers, high contact perpetrators were less involved in the peer networks, less connected to trusted adults, and more likely to have friends who were involved in risky behaviors (e.g., sexual violence, homophobic name-calling, substance use). Low contact perpetrators were as connected to peers and trusted adults as non-perpetrators but were more likely to have friends engaged in sexual violence and homophobic naming-calling perpetration. By contrast, sexual harassment perpetrators were more involved and held higher status in the peer network (e.g., received more friendship nominations) but otherwise had similar friendship characteristics and similar connections to trusted adults as non-perpetrators. Building on these results, social network-informed SV prevention should use opinion leaders to change SV norms throughout the network and encourage new relationships between low- and high-risk students so as to disseminate norms that do not tolerate SV. Promoting connections to trusted adults also may be a useful avenue, especially for isolated adolescents. (Authors' abstract). Record #7317