Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Examining technology-facilitated intimate partner violence : a systematic review of journal articles Chumrye Kim and Riccardo Ferraresso

By: Kim, Chumrye.
Contributor(s): Ferraresso, Riccardo.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Trauma, Violence & Abuse.Publisher: Sage, 2022Subject(s): DATING VIOLENCE | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | TECHNOLOGY-FACILITATED ABUSE | YOUNG PEOPLE | INTERNATIONALOnline resources: DOI: 10.1177%2F15248380211061402 In: Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2022, First published online, 2 February 2022Summary: As intimate partner violence in a cyber world is increasing, scholars have started to pay attention to this phenomenon. This study aims to provide a systematic review of empirical studies in the technology-facilitated intimate partner violence (TFIPV) field. We analyzed 31 studies that examined direct TFIPV perpetration and/or victimization experiences identified from four of the largest databases (i.e., Web of Science, PsycInfo, PubMed, and SCOPUS). We found that most studies recruited adolescents or young adults (i.e., college students) and used a very diverse range of terminologies that describe similar phenomena but are not based on validated instruments. We discuss the implications of our findings and suggestions that can enhance the field’s rigor and guide future research. (Authors' abstract). Record #7532
No physical items for this record

Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2022, First published online, 2 February 2022

As intimate partner violence in a cyber world is increasing, scholars have started to pay attention to this phenomenon. This study aims to provide a systematic review of empirical studies in the technology-facilitated intimate partner violence (TFIPV) field. We analyzed 31 studies that examined direct TFIPV perpetration and/or victimization experiences identified from four of the largest databases (i.e., Web of Science, PsycInfo, PubMed, and SCOPUS). We found that most studies recruited adolescents or young adults (i.e., college students) and used a very diverse range of terminologies that describe similar phenomena but are not based on validated instruments. We discuss the implications of our findings and suggestions that can enhance the field’s rigor and guide future research. (Authors' abstract). Record #7532