Prevention of violence against women and girls : what does the evidence say? Mary Ellsberg, Diana J. Arango, Matthew Morton, Floriza Gennari, Sveinung Kiplesund, Manuel Contreras, Charlotte Watts
By: Ellsberg, Mary
.
Contributor(s): Arango, Diana J | Morton, Matthew | Gennari, Floriza | Kiplesund, Sveinung | Contreras, Manuel | Watts, Charlotte H.
Material type: 
ArticleSeries: The Lancet.Publisher: The Lancet, 2015Other title: Violence against women and girls 1.Subject(s): PREVENTION | SEXUAL VIOLENCE | RECOMMENDED READING | CHILD MARRIAGE | COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTERVENTION | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM) | PRIMARY PREVENTION | The Lancet Series (2014): Violence against women and girls | VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN | YOUNG WOMENOnline resources: Read the abstract | Alternative link | The Lancet VAWG Series
In:
The Lancet, 2015, 385(9977): 1555–1566Summary: In this Series paper, the first of five, the authors review evidence for interventions to reduce the prevalence and incidence of violence against women and girls. The reviewed studies cover a broad range of intervention models, and many forms of violence — ie, intimate partner violence, non-partner sexual assault, female genital mutilation, and child marriage. Evidence is highly skewed towards that from studies from high-income countries, with these evaluations mainly focusing on responses to violence. (from the abstract)
The Lancet, 2015, 385(9977): 1555–1566
Recommended reading
In this Series paper, the first of five, the authors review evidence for interventions to reduce the prevalence and incidence of violence against women and girls. The reviewed studies cover a broad range of intervention models, and many forms of violence — ie, intimate partner violence, non-partner sexual assault, female genital mutilation, and child marriage. Evidence is highly skewed towards that from studies from high-income countries, with these evaluations mainly focusing on responses to violence. (from the abstract)
