Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Unpacking “sexting” : a systematic review of nonconsensual sexting in legal, educational, and psychological literatures Michelle A. Krieger

By: Krieger, Michelle A.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Trauma, Violence & Abuse.Publisher: Sage, 2017Subject(s): ONLINE HARASSMENT | IMAGE-BASED SEXUAL ABUSE | SEXUAL HARASSMENT | SOCIAL MEDIA | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | TECHNOLOGY-FACILITATED ABUSE | YOUNG PEOPLE | YOUNG WOMENOnline resources: DOI: 10.1177/1524838016659486 In: Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2017, 18(5): 593-601Summary: A systematic review was conducted to determine the extent to which consensual and nonconsensual acts were conflated in the legal, educational, and psychological literatures on sexting, and how nonconsensual sexting was conceptualized within these disciplines. Definitions of sexting varied widely with regard to the inclusion or exclusion of nonconsensual acts. Nonconsensual acts were conceptualized in the following ways: as a risk of sexing, as being the fault of the victim, as bullying, or as a form of violence against women. Implications for research and practice are discussed. (From the abstract). Record #5091
No physical items for this record

Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2017, 18(5): 593-601

A systematic review was conducted to determine the extent to which consensual and nonconsensual acts were conflated in the legal, educational, and psychological literatures on sexting, and how nonconsensual sexting was conceptualized within these disciplines. Definitions of sexting varied widely with regard to the inclusion or exclusion of nonconsensual acts. Nonconsensual acts were conceptualized in the following ways: as a risk of sexing, as being the fault of the victim, as bullying, or as a form of violence against women. Implications for research and practice are discussed. (From the abstract). Record #5091