Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Translating inclusion into influence in New Zealand : the conundrum of engaging gender organizations in public policy Rachel Simon-Kumar

By: Simon-Kumar, Rachel.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Journal of Women, Politics and Policy.Publisher: Taylor & Francis, 2018Subject(s): GENDER ISSUES | GOVERNMENT POLICY | NONPROFIT ORGANISATIONS | SOCIAL POLICY | WOMEN | NEW ZEALANDOnline resources: Read abstract In: Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 2018, Advance online publication, 3 April 2018Summary: Women’s and gender organizations in New Zealand, like the rest of the community sector, capitalized on opportunities to engage with government as part of an inclusive turn in policymaking in the last decade. For the local women’s movement, inclusion offered the promise of strategic policy involvement at a time when the women’s movement was in “abeyance.” While governmental rhetoric emphasizes trusting and open relationships, the reality of engagement for organizations is complex, and the lasting influence they have on policy processes and outcomes is questionable. This article, based on the qualitative empirical analyses of interviews with over 30 representatives of community organizations, activists, scholars, and policymakers, identifies the opportunity structures of influence in the inclusive policy relationship. Emergent themes from the interviews showed that influence was tied to three key characteristics: fiscal autonomy, organizational legitimacy, and discursive alignment with the state’s discourses. Overall, the analysis points to new opportunities of influence created by the inclusive agenda, yet they are strained by the need to maintain ongoing collaborative relationships between the women’s sector and the state. (Author's abstract). Record #5811
No physical items for this record

Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 2018, Advance online publication, 3 April 2018

Women’s and gender organizations in New Zealand, like the rest of the community sector, capitalized on opportunities to engage with government as part of an inclusive turn in policymaking in the last decade. For the local women’s movement, inclusion offered the promise of strategic policy involvement at a time when the women’s movement was in “abeyance.” While governmental rhetoric emphasizes trusting and open relationships, the reality of engagement for organizations is complex, and the lasting influence they have on policy processes and outcomes is questionable. This article, based on the qualitative empirical analyses of interviews with over 30 representatives of community organizations, activists, scholars, and policymakers, identifies the opportunity structures of influence in the inclusive policy relationship. Emergent themes from the interviews showed that influence was tied to three key characteristics: fiscal autonomy, organizational legitimacy, and discursive alignment with the state’s discourses. Overall, the analysis points to new opportunities of influence created by the inclusive agenda, yet they are strained by the need to maintain ongoing collaborative relationships between the women’s sector and the state. (Author's abstract). Record #5811