Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Māori, family group conferencing and the mystifications of restorative justice Paora Moyle and Juan Marcellus Tauri

By: Moyle, Paora.
Contributor(s): Tauri, Juan M.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Victims & Offenders.Publisher: Taylor & Francis, 2016Description: electronic document (10 pages) ; PDF file: 489 KB.Subject(s): FAMILY VIOLENCE | TŪKINOTANGA Ā-WHĀNAU | PATU TAMARIKI | CHILD ABUSE | CHILD PROTECTION | CULTURAL ISSUES | FAMILY GROUP CONFERENCES | MĀORI | RESTORATIVE JUSTICE | SOCIAL WORK | RANGAHAU MĀORI | TIKANGA TUKU IHO | TOKO I TE ORA | WHĀNAU | NEW ZEALANDOnline resources: Read abstract In: Victims & Offenders, 2016, 11(1): 87-106Summary: The Family Group Conferencing (FGC) forum is often presented by policy entrepreneurs and advocates as indicative of the ability of restorative justice (RJ) to accommodate the cultural and justice needs of diverse populations. In this article, we present recent empirical research from one of the authors on Māori experiences of the forum. Drawing from this research, as well as other secondary sources, we demonstrate that far from being an exemplar of culturally appropriate justice practice, the forum is experienced by some Māori participants as one that encloses Indigenous culture and Indigenous participants within a Eurocentric, formulaic, and standardized process. The final section of our article reveals changes to the development of restorative policies and the practice in the Aotearoa New Zealand context that Māori participants believe are necessary to make the movement, and interventions such as the FGC, an empowering experience for Māori. (Authors' abstract). Record 5841
No physical items for this record

Victims & Offenders, 2016, 11(1): 87-106

The Family Group Conferencing (FGC) forum is often presented by policy entrepreneurs and advocates as indicative of the ability of restorative justice (RJ) to accommodate the cultural and justice needs of diverse populations. In this article, we present recent empirical research from one of the authors on Māori experiences of the forum. Drawing from this research, as well as other secondary sources, we demonstrate that far from being an exemplar of culturally appropriate justice practice, the forum is experienced by some Māori participants as one that encloses Indigenous culture and Indigenous participants within a Eurocentric, formulaic, and standardized process. The final section of our article reveals changes to the development of restorative policies and the practice in the Aotearoa New Zealand context that Māori participants believe are necessary to make the movement, and interventions such as the FGC, an empowering experience for Māori. (Authors' abstract). Record 5841