Normal view MARC view ISBD view

How to integrate the Good Lives Model Into treatment programs for sexual offending : an introduction and overview Gwenda M. Willis, Pamela M. Yates, Theresa A. Gannon and Tony Ward

By: Willis, Gwenda M.
Contributor(s): Yates, Pamela M | Gannon, Theresa A | Ward, Tony.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.Publisher: Sage, 2012Subject(s): SEXUAL VIOLENCE | OFFENDERS | SEX OFFENDERS | REHABILITATION | TREATMENT | AUSTRALIAOnline resources: Read abstract In: Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2012, 25(2) 123–142Summary: The good lives model (GLM) represents a new theoretical framework informing sex offender treatment programs; however, substantial variation has been observed in terms of how GLM-related ideas and practices have been applied. Integrated appropriately, the GLM offers potential for improving outcomes of programs following a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) approach and operating according to a narrow operationalization of risk, need, responsivity (RNR) principles. Conversely, misguided or otherwise poor integration could increase the very risk practitioners work to prevent and manage. The purpose of this article is to provide an introduction and overview on how to integrate the GLM into treatment using CBT and RNR. The authors describe clinical implications of the GLM as they relate to program aims and orientation, assessment and intervention planning, content, and delivery. (Authors' abstract). Record #6386
No physical items for this record

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2012, 25(2) 123–142

The good lives model (GLM) represents a new theoretical framework informing sex offender treatment programs; however, substantial variation has been observed in terms of how GLM-related ideas and practices have been applied. Integrated appropriately, the GLM offers potential for improving outcomes of programs following a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) approach and operating according to a narrow operationalization of risk, need, responsivity (RNR) principles. Conversely, misguided or otherwise poor integration could increase the very risk practitioners work to prevent and manage. The purpose of this article is to provide an introduction and overview on how to integrate the GLM into treatment using CBT and RNR. The authors describe clinical implications of the GLM as they relate to program aims and orientation, assessment and intervention planning, content, and delivery. (Authors' abstract). Record #6386