Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Child protective services guidelines for substantiating exposure to domestic violence as maltreatment and assigning caregiver responsibility : policy analysis and recommendations Bryan G. Victor, Ashley N. Rousson, Colleen Henry, Haresh B. Dalvi and E. Susana Mariscal

By: Victor, Bryan G.
Contributor(s): Rousson, Ashley N | Henry, Colleen | Dalvi, Haresh B | Mariscal, E. Susana.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Child Maltreatment.Publisher: Sage, 2021Subject(s): CHILD ABUSE | CHILD EXPOSURE TO VIOLENCE | CHILD PROTECTION | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | PERPETRATORS | RISK ASSESSMENT | VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTERNATIONAL | UNITED STATESOnline resources: DOI: 10.1177/10775595211002639 In: Child Maltreatment, 2021, Advance online publication, 24 March 2021Summary: The purpose of this study was to examine the range of policy approaches used by child welfare systems in the United States to guide workers in classifying and substantiating child exposure to domestic violence (CEDV) as an actionable form of maltreatment. To that end, we conducted a qualitative document analysis of child protective services (CPS) policy manuals from all state-administered child welfare systems in the U.S. (N = 41). Our findings indicate that a majority of state-administered systems (71%) have adopted policy requiring workers to demonstrate that children have endured harm or the threat of harm before substantiating CEDV-related maltreatment. Many state systems (51%) also include policy directives that require workers to identify a primary aggressor during CPS investigations involving CEDV, while far fewer (37%) provide language that potentially exonerates survivors of domestic violence from being held accountable for failure to protect on the basis of their own victimization. Based on our findings and identification of policy exemplars, we offer a recommended set of quality policy indicators for states to consider in the formulation of their policy guidelines for substantiating children’s exposure to domestic violence that promotes the safety and wellbeing of both children and adult survivors of domestic violence. (Authors' abstract). Record #7087
No physical items for this record

Child Maltreatment, 2021, Advance online publication, 24 March 2021

The purpose of this study was to examine the range of policy approaches used by child welfare systems in the United States to guide workers in classifying and substantiating child exposure to domestic violence (CEDV) as an actionable form of maltreatment. To that end, we conducted a qualitative document analysis of child protective services (CPS) policy manuals from all state-administered child welfare systems in the U.S. (N = 41). Our findings indicate that a majority of state-administered systems (71%) have adopted policy requiring workers to demonstrate that children have endured harm or the threat of harm before substantiating CEDV-related maltreatment. Many state systems (51%) also include policy directives that require workers to identify a primary aggressor during CPS investigations involving CEDV, while far fewer (37%) provide language that potentially exonerates survivors of domestic violence from being held accountable for failure to protect on the basis of their own victimization. Based on our findings and identification of policy exemplars, we offer a recommended set of quality policy indicators for states to consider in the formulation of their policy guidelines for substantiating children’s exposure to domestic violence that promotes the safety and wellbeing of both children and adult survivors of domestic violence. (Authors' abstract). Record #7087