Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intimate partner violence advocates and agencies Rebecca Garcia, Cynterria Henderson, Kimberly Randell, Andrés Villaveces, Abbey Katz, Fatimah Abioye, Sarah DeGue, Kelley Premo, Summer Miller‑Wallfish, Judy C. Chang, Elizabeth Miller and Maya I. Ragavan

By: Garcia, Rebecca.
Contributor(s): Henderson, Cynterria | Randell, Kimberly | Villaveces, Andrés | Katz, Abbey | Abioye, Fatimah | DeGue, Sarah | Premo, Kelley | Miller-Wallfish, Summer | Chang, Judy C | Miller, Elizabeth | Ragavan, Maya I.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Journal of Family Violence.Publisher: Springer, 2021Subject(s): COVID-19 | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | PANDEMICS | SUPPORT SERVICES | INTERNATIONAL | UNITED STATESOnline resources: DOI: 10.1007/s10896-021-00337-7 (Open access) In: Journal of Family Violence, 2021, First published online, 20 October 2021Summary: Relatively few studies have considered the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intimate partner violence (IPV) advocates or the agencies where they work. In this study, based on United States IPV advocates’ experiences working with survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted interviews to explore: 1) personal challenges and resilience working as IPV advocates during the COVID-19 pandemic; 2) how agencies adapted to the pandemic to support IPV survivors and advocates; and 3) specific needs and challenges of culturally-specific agencies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 53 IPV advocates from June to November 2020. Participants were included if they worked directly with survivors, identified as an IPV advocate, worked at a US-based agency, and spoke and understood English. We created a sampling matrix to ensure adequate representation from IPV advocates serving survivors from communities which have been marginalized. Interviews were conducted through a virtual platform by a trained member of the research team. We used an inductive thematic analysis approach, with weekly coding meetings to resolve discrepancies in coding. Five themes emerged from the data: 1) IPV advocates described how working as an IPV advocate during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them personally; 2) agencies developed new methods of addressing IPV advocates’ needs; 3) agencies developed new solutions to address pandemic-related client needs; 4) transitioning advocacy work to virtual formats created challenges but also opportunities and; 5) pandemic limitations and impacts compounded pre-pandemic challenges for culturally specific agencies. IPV advocates are frontline workers who have played essential roles in adjusting services to meet survivor needs during the COVID-19 pandemic while simultaneously coping with pandemic impacts on themselves and their agencies. Developing inter-agency collaborations and promoting advocates’ safety and wellbeing during future public health crises will help support IPV survivors. (Authors' abstract). Record #7363
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON21110028

Journal of Family Violence, 2021, First published online, 20 October 2021

Relatively few studies have considered the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intimate partner violence (IPV) advocates or the agencies where they work. In this study, based on United States IPV advocates’ experiences working with survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted interviews to explore: 1) personal challenges and resilience working as IPV advocates during the COVID-19 pandemic; 2) how agencies adapted to the pandemic to support IPV survivors and advocates; and 3) specific needs and challenges of culturally-specific agencies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 53 IPV advocates from June to November 2020. Participants were included if they worked directly with survivors, identified as an IPV advocate, worked at a US-based agency, and spoke and understood English. We created a sampling matrix to ensure adequate representation from IPV advocates serving survivors from communities which have been marginalized. Interviews were conducted through a virtual platform by a trained member of the research team. We used an inductive thematic analysis approach, with weekly coding meetings to resolve discrepancies in coding. Five themes emerged from the data: 1) IPV advocates described how working as an IPV advocate during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them personally; 2) agencies developed new methods of addressing IPV advocates’ needs; 3) agencies developed new solutions to address pandemic-related client needs; 4) transitioning advocacy work to virtual formats created challenges but also opportunities and; 5) pandemic limitations and impacts compounded pre-pandemic challenges for culturally specific agencies. IPV advocates are frontline workers who have played essential roles in adjusting services to meet survivor needs during the COVID-19 pandemic while simultaneously coping with pandemic impacts on themselves and their agencies. Developing inter-agency collaborations and promoting advocates’ safety and wellbeing during future public health crises will help support IPV survivors. (Authors' abstract). Record #7363