Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Is there an association between controlling behaviour and intimate partner violence revictimization : Presented at the New Zealand Evidence Based Policing Centre Conference Apriel Jolliffe Simpson, Jordan Tomkins, Samantha Taaka and Devon Polaschek [Poster]

By: Jolliffe Simpson, Apriel.
Contributor(s): Tomkins, Jordan | Taaka, Samantha | Polaschek, Devon L. L.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Hamilton, New Zealand : University of Waikato, 2021Description: electronic document (1 page) ; PDF file.Subject(s): COERCIVE CONTROL | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | ECONOMIC ABUSE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | PERPETRATORS | PHYSICAL ABUSE | RISK FACTORS | VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | NEW ZEALANDOnline resources: Click here to access online Summary: It is becoming increasingly recognized that controlling behaviours are a widespread form of harm experienced by victims of intimate partner violence; and in some countries ‘coercive control’ – the repetitive and systematic use of controlling behaviours over time – has become a criminal offence. However, the extent to which controlling behaviours are detected by law enforcement, and the utility of this information for predicting revictimization, remains unclear. Therefore, in this study we recorded the presence of five types of controlling behaviours in a sample of police reports for 629 medium- and high-risk cases from the Integrated Safety Response (ISR). We examined the relationship between these controlling behaviours and two measures of revictimization over the following six months: physical harm and injuries. We found that controlling behaviours in these initial reports could be used to predict physical harm to the victim during the follow-up period, with economic and threatening control being the strongest predictors. Controlling behaviours did not predict subsequent injuries. Our ability to predict both types of revictimization outcomes became stronger with the addition of information about the presence of physical harm in the index episode and police’s SAFVR and DYRA risk categorisations, indicating that information about controlling behaviour could complement police’s existing family violence risk assessment practices, rather than being used in place of them. (Author's abstract). Record #7606
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON22040010

It is becoming increasingly recognized that controlling behaviours are a widespread form of harm experienced by victims of intimate partner violence; and in some countries ‘coercive control’ – the repetitive and systematic use of controlling behaviours over time – has become a criminal offence. However, the extent to which controlling behaviours are detected by law enforcement, and the utility of this information for predicting revictimization, remains unclear. Therefore, in this study we recorded the presence of five types of controlling behaviours in a sample of police reports for 629 medium- and high-risk cases from the Integrated Safety Response (ISR). We examined the relationship between these controlling behaviours and two measures of revictimization over the following six months: physical harm and injuries. We found that controlling behaviours in these initial reports could be used to predict physical harm to the victim during the follow-up period, with economic and threatening control being the strongest predictors. Controlling behaviours did not predict subsequent injuries. Our ability to predict both types of revictimization outcomes became stronger with the addition of information about the presence of physical harm in the index episode and police’s SAFVR and DYRA risk categorisations, indicating that information about controlling behaviour could complement police’s existing family violence risk assessment practices, rather than being used in place of them. (Author's abstract). Record #7606