Normal view MARC view ISBD view

What is femicide? : Sylvia Walby the United Nations and the measurement of progress in complex epistemic systems

By: Walby, Sylvia.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Current Sociology.Publisher: Sage, 2023Subject(s): UNITED NATIONS | DATA COLLECTION | FEMICIDE | GENDER EQUALITY | HOMICIDE | STATISTICS | VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN | INTERNATIONAL | UNITED KINGDOMOnline resources: DOI: 10.1177/00113921221084357 (Open access) | Read related articles in this journal issue In: Current Sociology, 2023, 71(1); 10-27Summary: Femicide is a key global indicator of progress towards gender equality. The occurrence of some but not all five gender dimensions in the indicators of violence used to measure progress towards United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 5, 11 and 16 are analysed as resulting from the tension between divergent feminist strategies that focus either on women-only or on mainstreaming intersecting inequalities. The tension between universalist and particularist projects underlies the contestations over the construction of these gendered indicators. The analysis develops a conceptualisation of indicators as assets in order to capture the social relations of power involved (rather than as boundary objects), supported by platforms (which can be public as well as corporate) and generated by dynamic epistemic systems (rather than stable epistemological infrastructures). (Author's abstract). Record #8267
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON23070006

Current Sociology, 2023, 71(1): 10-27

Femicide is a key global indicator of progress towards gender equality. The occurrence of some but not all five gender dimensions in the indicators of violence used to measure progress towards United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 5, 11 and 16 are analysed as resulting from the tension between divergent feminist strategies that focus either on women-only or on mainstreaming intersecting inequalities. The tension between universalist and particularist projects underlies the contestations over the construction of these gendered indicators. The analysis develops a conceptualisation of indicators as assets in order to capture the social relations of power involved (rather than as boundary objects), supported by platforms (which can be public as well as corporate) and generated by dynamic epistemic systems (rather than stable epistemological infrastructures). (Author's abstract). Record #8267