Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The effect of family-based therapy on child physical abuse and neglect : a narrative systematic review George Economidis, , Rhiannon Pilkington, John Lynch, Timothy Dobbins, Anthony Shakeshaft, Madeleine Powell, Anne-Marie Eades and Kathleen Falster

By: Economidis, George.
Contributor(s): Pilkington, Rhiannon | Lynch, Johne [Dobbins, Timothy] | Shakeshaft, Anthony | Powell, Madeline | Eades, Anne-Marie | Falster, Kathleen.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: International Journal of Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice.Publisher: Springer, 2023Subject(s): CHILD ABUSE | CHILD NEGLECT | FAMILY THERAPY | INTERVENTION | PARENTING PROGRAMMES | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | INTERNATIONAL | AUSTRALIAOnline resources: DOI: 10.1007/s42448-023-00170-z (Open access) In: International Journal of Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 2023, First published online, 27 July 2023Summary: Family-based therapy is a common front-line strategy to prevent child maltreatment in high-risk families. This review aimed to systematically assess the evidence of the effect of family-based therapy programs on child maltreatment outcomes. CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO were systematically searched to March 25, 2023. Outcome data were extracted for child protection reports and out-of-home care (OOHC) placements from administrative data, and parent- or child-reported maltreatment risk. 12 RCTs and two observational studies of 8,410 screened were included. All 14 studies had high risk of bias. Sample sizes ranged from 43 in an RCT to 3875 families in an observational study. In seven studies with child protection report risk estimates, five studies (3 RCTs, 2 observational) showed results in favor of the intervention (risk differences (RD) of 2.0–41.1 percentage points) and two RCTs in favor of the comparison (RD, 2.0–8.6 percentage points). In the four studies with OOHC risk estimates, three studies (2 RCTs, 1 observational) showed results in favor of the intervention (RD, 0.9–17.4 percentage points) and one observational study showed results in favor of the comparison (RD, 1.5 percentage points). Most studies had ≤ 100 participants, did not estimate main causal effects, and had high risk of bias. Thus, although family-based therapy programs may reduce child maltreatment, the high risk of bias, typically small sample sizes (> 62% of studies had sample sizes < 100), and inconsistent results across studies means it is currently unclear whether family-based therapy interventions achieve better child maltreatment outcomes, compared with usual care services. (Authors' abstract). Record #8336
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
oNLINE Available ON23090001

International Journal of Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 2023, First published online, 27 July 2023.

Family-based therapy is a common front-line strategy to prevent child maltreatment in high-risk families. This review aimed to systematically assess the evidence of the effect of family-based therapy programs on child maltreatment outcomes. CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO were systematically searched to March 25, 2023. Outcome data were extracted for child protection reports and out-of-home care (OOHC) placements from administrative data, and parent- or child-reported maltreatment risk. 12 RCTs and two observational studies of 8,410 screened were included. All 14 studies had high risk of bias. Sample sizes ranged from 43 in an RCT to 3875 families in an observational study. In seven studies with child protection report risk estimates, five studies (3 RCTs, 2 observational) showed results in favor of the intervention (risk differences (RD) of 2.0–41.1 percentage points) and two RCTs in favor of the comparison (RD, 2.0–8.6 percentage points). In the four studies with OOHC risk estimates, three studies (2 RCTs, 1 observational) showed results in favor of the intervention (RD, 0.9–17.4 percentage points) and one observational study showed results in favor of the comparison (RD, 1.5 percentage points). Most studies had ≤ 100 participants, did not estimate main causal effects, and had high risk of bias. Thus, although family-based therapy programs may reduce child maltreatment, the high risk of bias, typically small sample sizes (> 62% of studies had sample sizes < 100), and inconsistent results across studies means it is currently unclear whether family-based therapy interventions achieve better child maltreatment outcomes, compared with usual care services. (Authors' abstract). Record #8336