Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Hidden hurt : Ayesha Scott the impact of post-separation financial violence in Aotearoa New Zealand

By: Scott, Ayesha.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Australian Journal of Family Law.Publisher: RMIT, 2020Subject(s): DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | COERCIVE CONTROL | ECONOMIC ASPECTS | FAMILY COURT | FAMILY LAW | FAMILY VIOLENCE | FAMILY VIOLENCE ACT 2018 | FINANCIAL ABUSE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | PERPETRATORS | PROPERTY (RELATIONSHIPS) ACT 1976 | SEPARATION | VICTIM/SURVIVORS' VOICES | NEW ZEALANDOnline resources: Read abstract In: Australian Journal of Family Law, 2020, 33(3)Summary: Intimate partner violence is recognised globally as a complex social problem, sitting at the intersection of health, law and finance. Now commonly recognised as a pattern of coercive control, rather than isolated incidents of physical violence, intimate partner violence encompasses a range of control tactics. Financial violence/control is often used in intimate partner violence to entrap an intimate partner. It does not need physical proximity to cause harm and is defined as the ways in which perpetrators use financial resources to control and terrorise their intimate partner. Its continuation post-separation is the focus of this article. I draw on interviews with 15 women, intimate partner violence victim-survivors with experience of Aotearoa New Zealand’s Family Court, to provide insight into what financial violence/control looks like post-separation and the ongoing costs it, and court proceedings, impose on survivors of intimate financial violence. (Author's abstract). Record #8390
No physical items for this record

Australian Journal of Family Law, 2020, 33(3):

Intimate partner violence is recognised globally as a complex social problem, sitting at the intersection of health, law and finance. Now commonly recognised as a pattern of coercive control, rather than isolated incidents of physical violence, intimate partner violence encompasses a range of control tactics. Financial violence/control is often used in intimate partner violence to entrap an intimate partner. It does not need physical proximity to cause harm and is defined as the ways in which perpetrators use financial resources to control and terrorise their intimate partner. Its continuation post-separation is the focus of this article. I draw on interviews with 15 women, intimate partner violence victim-survivors with experience of Aotearoa New Zealand’s Family Court, to provide insight into what financial violence/control looks like post-separation and the ongoing costs it, and court proceedings, impose on survivors of intimate financial violence. (Author's abstract). Record #8390