Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Gender, risk assessment and coercive control : Charlotte Barlow and Sandra Walklate contradictions in terms?

By: Barlow, Charlotte.
Contributor(s): Walklate, Sandra.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: The British Journal of Criminology.Publisher: Oxford Academic, 2021Subject(s): COERCIVE CONTROL | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | POLICE PROCEDURES | RISK ASSESSMENT | VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN | INTERNATIONAL | UNITED KINGDOMOnline resources: DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azaa104 (Free) In: The British Journal of Criminology, 2021, 61(4): 887-904Summary: In December 2015, the criminal offence of coercive control was introduced in England and Wales. Whilst, in this legislation, this concept is presumed to be gender-neutral, there is widespread agreement that coercive control is gendered. Using empirical data gathered in one police force area in the South of England, this paper offers an exploration of the feasibility of the extent to which existing risk assessment practices and understandings of risk embedded within them, can incorporate the phenomenon of coercive control. The findings highlight concerns about gender-blind, incident-led (rather than process-led) approaches to assessing risk when these approaches are set against victim/survivor concerns. These concerns highlight the inherent problems embedded in the contemporary gender-blind embrace of the concept of risk as assumed in practices of risk assessment. (Authors' abstract). Record #8596
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON24030037

The British Journal of Criminology, 2021, 61(4): 887-904

In December 2015, the criminal offence of coercive control was introduced in England and Wales. Whilst, in this legislation, this concept is presumed to be gender-neutral, there is widespread agreement that coercive control is gendered. Using empirical data gathered in one police force area in the South of England, this paper offers an exploration of the feasibility of the extent to which existing risk assessment practices and understandings of risk embedded within them, can incorporate the phenomenon of coercive control. The findings highlight concerns about gender-blind, incident-led (rather than process-led) approaches to assessing risk when these approaches are set against victim/survivor concerns. These concerns highlight the inherent problems embedded in the contemporary gender-blind embrace of the concept of risk as assumed in practices of risk assessment. (Authors' abstract). Record #8596