Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Judicial actors’ understanding of the mental health impacts of intimate partner violence : a scoping review Susan Lynn Heward-Belle, Parveen Azam Ali, Julieta Marotta, Debbie Hager, Michaela Rogers and Lynette Stevenson

By: , Heward-Belle, Susan L.
Contributor(s): Ali, Parveen A | Marotta, Julieta | Hager, Debbie | Rogers, Michaela | Stevenson, Lynette.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticleSeries: Trauma, Violence & Abuse.Publisher: Sage, 2024Subject(s): DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE | JUSTICE | LITERATURE REVIEWS | MENTAL HEALTH | PERPETRATORS | RISK FACTORS | VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | INTERNATIONAL | AUSTRALIA | NEW ZEALAND | tHE NETHERLANCE | UNITED KINGDOMOnline resources: DOI: 10.1177/15248380241244494 (Open access) In: Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2024, First published online 17 April 2024Summary: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health issue that has grave physical and mental health consequences for millions of women. The judicial system plays a critical role in responding to IPV principally through the criminal justice system, family law, and/or child welfare jurisdictions. However, victims/survivors who interact with the legal system report negative experiences. An under-researched area of scholarship is the degree to which judicial actors understand the mental health impacts of IPV on victims/survivors and how they apply that knowledge in practice. This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesize existing scholarship on judicial actors’ understanding of the mental health impacts of IPV on women survivors. We searched 10 databases (Medline, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Westlaw, HeinOnline, the Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Library databases) for studies published between 2000 and 2023. A total of 27 studies were included in the review. We identified five main themes, including: awareness of survivors’ experiences, gap in judicial actors’ knowledge, understanding of perpetrator tactics and risk factors, disclosing mental health problems, training, and guidance. The review highlights significant gaps in judicial actors’ understanding of this issue and recommends strategies to increase the awareness and understanding of IPV among judicial actors. The findings can be used to justify future research to better understand the training and development needs of judicial actors to improve their level of awareness of the dynamics and impact of IPV and to make policy and practice recommendations to build the capacity of the judicial workforce. (Authors' abstract). Record #8638
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Access online Access online Family Violence library
Online Available ON24040019

Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2024, First published online 17 April 2024

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health issue that has grave physical and mental health consequences for millions of women. The judicial system plays a critical role in responding to IPV principally through the criminal justice system, family law, and/or child welfare jurisdictions. However, victims/survivors who interact with the legal system report negative experiences. An under-researched area of scholarship is the degree to which judicial actors understand the mental health impacts of IPV on victims/survivors and how they apply that knowledge in practice. This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesize existing scholarship on judicial actors’ understanding of the mental health impacts of IPV on women survivors. We searched 10 databases (Medline, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Westlaw, HeinOnline, the Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Library databases) for studies published between 2000 and 2023. A total of 27 studies were included in the review. We identified five main themes, including: awareness of survivors’ experiences, gap in judicial actors’ knowledge, understanding of perpetrator tactics and risk factors, disclosing mental health problems, training, and guidance. The review highlights significant gaps in judicial actors’ understanding of this issue and recommends strategies to increase the awareness and understanding of IPV among judicial actors. The findings can be used to justify future research to better understand the training and development needs of judicial actors to improve their level of awareness of the dynamics and impact of IPV and to make policy and practice recommendations to build the capacity of the judicial workforce. (Authors' abstract). Record #8638